For over 30 years, healthcare interoperability has spoken one language: HL7 V2.
If you are a PACS Administrator, you know the drill: An order is placed in the EMR, a ORM message fires over a VPN tunnel, the RIS catches it, and eventually, a ORU message sends the result back. It is a “push-based” system—reliable, but rigid.
But as healthcare moves toward Enterprise Imaging and Patient-Centric Care, the limitations of V2 are becoming bottlenecks. The industry is shifting to HL7 FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources).
This isn’t just a version upgrade; it is a fundamental architectural shift from “Messaging” to “APIs.”
This guide explores the technical differences between HL7 V2 and FHIR in the context of medical imaging and why your next PACS must be FHIR-native.
The Old Way: HL7 V2 (The “Push” Model)
When comparing DICOM vs HL7, the HL7 V2 is an event-driven messaging standard. It works like a fax machine, sending digital text.
How it works in Radiology:
- Trigger Event: A doctor signs an order in Epic/Cerner.
-
The Push: The EMR generates a pipe-delimited text string (e.g.,
MSH|^~\&|EPIC|...). - The Blind Handshake: It sends this message to an Interface Engine (such as Mirth or Cloverleaf), which translates it and sends it to the PACS.
The Problem with V2 in 2025:
- No “Pull” Capability: If the PACS wants to know the patient’s creatinine level before a contrast CT, it can’t ask. It has to wait for the EMR to decide to send it.
- Data Silos: V2 messages are transactional. They don’t create a shared, longitudinal record; they just copy data from System A to System B.
- Integration Cost: Each new connection requires a custom point-to-point interface, which takes time and money.
The New Way: HL7 FHIR (The “API” Model)
FHIR (pronounced “Fire”) brings modern web technology (RESTful APIs, JSON, XML) to healthcare. It works like the internet.
How it works in Radiology:
Instead of waiting for a message, the PACS can actively “browse” the EMR’s data using standard web requests (GET, POST).
The FHIR Advantage:
- Query-Based (“Pull”): The PACS can actively query the EMR: “GET Patient/123/Observation?code=Creatinine.” The EMR responds instantly with the JSON data.
- Mobile Ready: FHIR is lightweight and designed for mobile apps, making it perfect for Zero-Footprint Viewers and patient portals.
- Granularity: You don’t need to ingest a massive patient record; you can request just the specific data points (Resources) you need.
(Note: While this diagram represents cloud architecture, the concept of modern API connectivity within a hybrid environment is relevant here. A diagram specifically showing “Point-to-Point V2 vs. Centralized FHIR API” would be ideal if available in the future.)
FHIR vs HL7 V2: The Head-to-Head Comparison
| Feature | HL7 V2 | HL7 FHIR |
| Architecture | Event-Driven Messaging (Push) | RESTful API (Pull & Push) |
| Format | Pipe-delimited text (` | `) |
| Flexibility | Rigid. Needs interface engines. | Flexible. Developers love it. |
| Imaging Context | Good for Orders/Results. | Essential for AI & Mobile. |
| Data Access | “Here is the data I sent you.” | “What data do you need?” |
Why FHIR Matters for Your Imaging Strategy
Why should a CIO care about the plumbing? Because FHIR unlocks workflows that V2 cannot handle.
1. Enabling AI & Machine Learning
AI algorithms need context. A V2 message tells the AI “Head CT.” A FHIR query allows the AI to look up the patient’s history: “Does this patient have a history of stroke?”
This context allows the AI to provide more accurate triage and diagnostic support.
2. True Longitudinal Patient Records
With FHIR, the PACS doesn’t just store images; it becomes a window into the patient’s health. A radiologist viewing an X-ray can pull live lab values or pathology reports from the EMR directly into the PACS sidebar without leaving their workflow.
3. Patient Portals & “Image Sharing”
Patients want to see their images on their phones. V2 cannot support this securely. FHIR integration allows patient-facing apps (like Apple Health) to securely authenticate and retrieve imaging reports and links to view images via DICOMweb.
Medicai: Native FHIR for the Connected Enterprise
Many legacy PACS vendors are trying to “patch” FHIR onto their 20-year-old codebases. They use “wrappers” that translate V2 to FHIR, which is slow and limited.
Medicai is different. Our platform was built in the cloud era, with FHIR and DICOMweb as its native languages.
- Seamless EMR Integration: We don’t need expensive interface engines to talk to your EMR. We connect via standard APIs.
- Developer-Friendly: Are you building a custom research tool or a patient app? Our open API documentation allows your internal developers to innovate on top of our platform.
- Future-Proof: As the 21st Century Cures Act mandates more data sharing, Medicai ensures your imaging infrastructure is already compliant.
Conclusion
HL7 V2 ran healthcare for 30 years, but it wasn’t built for the age of AI, Cloud, and Mobile.
Sticking with a V2-only PACS is like trying to browse the modern web with a fax machine.
To build a truly interoperable, patient-centric imaging environment, you need a PACS that speaks the language of the future.
Is your PACS trapped in the 90s?
Let us help you get an update!
